Is this quote from the book ”English Grammar Simplified” sexist?

6

”…everyone who wishes to understand English grammar and to improve his speech and writing.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Filed under Grammar FAQ by on . Comment#

Comments on Is this quote from the book ”English Grammar Simplified” sexist? Leave a Comment

April 25, 2011

Daniel S @ 3:11 am #

I don’t think it’s sexist…I think it’s improper English.

graeme1944 @ 3:13 am #

Definitely.
It has no gender using “everyone” then gets it wrong by using “his”, this should be replaced with the word “their”.
Added: Why are there aircraft “Cockpits” now we have female Pilots? Some now refer to this now as the “Flight Deck”.

adriennelucier @ 3:23 am #

It does sound kind of sexist, yes. This debate has been going on for a long time. Generally it’s resolved by saying “his or her” or “their” instead of choosing either the masculine or feminine possessive. Where I work, we try to avoid writing sentences that force us to use this kind of phrasing. I might say, “…people who wish to understand English grammar and improve their speech and writing.”

fireseeker4him @ 4:06 am #

No, it’s just implying that males are the only ones who need to improve their speech and writing. jk.

Seriously, though, he, his, him, whatever, they’re generic terms and people need to get over the fact that it is.

If you’re going to say that it’s sexist then you might as well argue that languages that use gender-specific articles are sexist. Why is chair feminine and car masculine? Obviously, there’s some sexism going on there. *sarcasm*

Why do we use female terms to describe boats and cars? It’s in the language and we can’t change it.

Also, it’s awkward when reading a really long sentence to keep reading he/she or his/her every time a person is indicated.

axe_attack @ 4:40 am #

Unbunch your shreddies Robert. ” Use of generic-isms is not ‘ist’ in any form. Should it be perceived as such,it will be a self-evident admission by those who do the strident perceiving that they have no knowledge of English grammar or composition.

Tom L @ 5:15 am #

That’s a nonsensical interpretation – it’s simply grammatically correct English.

Leave a Comment

Fields marked by an asterisk (*) are required.

*

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Stumbleupon button
All trademarks and copyrights owned by their respective owners and are used for illustration only
Kokopelli Creative Web Design
kepolesen1,oguyannsea1,kepolesen1,igele1,kepolesen1,oguyannsea1,kepolesen1,kepolesen1,oguyannsea1,igele1,kepolesen1,igele1,kepolesen1,kepolesen1,igele1,